Thursday gets suspended from Twitter

octophone

Cows!
Pronouns
she/her
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
65,811
Howdy.

Yesterday it was @ButterTart , which Moopist is going to get a time out today? I might have a go myself...Dominic Raab seems like a particularly spineless sack of shit, feels like a good target.
 
Greetings from Istanbul, which I like but don’t love like many do. Bit too BUSY for me, but I’ve bought a few spices, so y’know, job done...
 
I've got family seemingly buoyed by Johnson's comments yesterday, rather than appalled. I think I'm going to leave Facebook & Twitter alone for a bit.
 
Istanbul is all about the delicious baklava in all its types and sorts, especially the all green pistacchio one.
 
Not a fan of baklava generally, too sweet for me.
 
One of our senior managers died in her sleep last night. I have several colleagues who worked with her and they're all absolutely gutted. Awful atmosphere now, inevitably. Poor soul, only in her mid 40's and it seems to have come out of nowhere too.
 
Not a fan of baklava generally, too sweet for me.

I don’t know how they do it in Turkey, but despite it being sweet, it’s never disgustingly sweet like the baklava you get everywhere else.
 
One of our senior managers died in her sleep last night. I have several colleagues who worked with her and they're all absolutely gutted. Awful atmosphere now, inevitably. Poor soul, only in her mid 40's and it seems to have come out of nowhere too.
Oh God. I really hate getting older as the death toll increases. That I've outlived several people I know occasionally blows my mind.

Wow I made that about me.

RIP Octy's colleague.
 
I'm going to the funeral on Monday, its a best mate from school's dad's.

I've been a bit down about the whole thing, because it's the first of my childhoods friends parents, meaning I'm now at the age where my parent's death is relatively soon.

At least my mum was only 18 when she had me, so she'll hopefully be around a lot longer, but I worry about my old man now.
 
I assume Octy means the age her mother was when she died?

I can't get my head around reaching pension age, because my father never did. And that was before they were increasing it.
 
I'm at the point where I recall my parents quite well at my current age.
 
Yeah that's scary. I can remember my both my parents' 40th birthdays quite clearly.

And how fucking old I thought they were at the time.
 
I'm at the point where I recall my parents quite well at my current age.

Oh that as well. I remember my Dads 40th, there was a big do and lots of adults eating weed cakes. Mines just around the corner.
 
To be fair, it'll be a big do with lots of weed cake too.
 
In fact I've been reconsoling my life with my parents a lot lately. I've suddenly had a bout of ambition for the first time in my adult life. I remember my Dad getting depressed (but not admitting it) mid 40, and I've been wondering if I have the same fate in store.
 
I assume Octy means the age her mother was when she died?

Yeah - I didn't phrase that well - she was 45 when she died, I'm 46 now. which I think is why I've been a bit obsessed with that age.
 
I'm 40 in just over 10 months. My Dad was earning more than me in 1989 than I am now. Not even adjusted for inflation.
 
Now here's some concerning stats. 20 years ago yesterday Blue by Eiffel 65 got to #1 in the UK.
 
I’ve just been in an earthquake here in Istanbul. It didn’t feel that bad but the world went crazy and everyone got up and started screaming and running.
 
ooh i love a good earthquake.

Not the massively shaky, kill a million people kind, mind. Just the low-rumble and "is that a subway or an earthquake" kind.
 
I've only experienced one earthquake and I have to say it was one of the most exciting things that's ever happened to me.
 
I have a possible dog-related quandary coming next week. He has a benign tumour in the glands about two inches down from the base of his tail (where it attaches to his body). It's of a size where there's only a 50-50 chance he can keep his tail if the vet removes the tumour because there wouldn't be enough skin or flesh left to close the gap but there's also the option of castration because the tumour is primarily caused by testosterone. Castration shrinks the tumour and prevents 95% of recurrences but it also causes weight gain. Having the tumour removed surgically with the possible tail amputation would be covered by the insurance (80% of it anyway) but there's no guarantee more tumours wouldn't develop because he still has testosterone and further tumours wouldn't be covered for treatment. But if we opt for castration (not covered by insurance) as well as tail surgery (covered) and he then gains weight it's likely he'll need a hip-replacement which wouldn't be covered by the insurance because it's a pre-existing condition and excluded on his policy (along with allergies, ear problems, skin problems, and arthritis). He only has the barest minimum of food for his size so we wouldn't be able to control his weight by reducing his food further.

I don't want my poor Ridley to lose his lovely tail or his nads!
 
Howdy.

Yesterday it was @ButterTart , which Moopist is going to get a time out today? I might have a go myself...Dominic Raab seems like a particularly spineless sack of shit, feels like a good target.
If You’re going to get put in Twitter jail, there’s no more worthy cause than calling a Tory a cunt. It’s a public service more than anything.

Anyway, I’m in COPENHAGEN. I’ve not been in a salty old queen of the sea since I went scuba diving with Zu Klara, so I’m having a right old time.
 
I have a possible dog-related quandary coming next week. He has a benign tumour in the glands about two inches down from the base of his tail (where it attaches to his body). It's of a size where there's only a 50-50 chance he can keep his tail if the vet removes the tumour because there wouldn't be enough skin or flesh left to close the gap but there's also the option of castration because the tumour is primarily caused by testosterone. Castration shrinks the tumour and prevents 95% of recurrences but it also causes weight gain. Having the tumour removed surgically with the possible tail amputation would be covered by the insurance (80% of it anyway) but there's no guarantee more tumours wouldn't develop because he still has testosterone and further tumours wouldn't be covered for treatment. But if we opt for castration (not covered by insurance) as well as tail surgery (covered) and he then gains weight it's likely he'll need a hip-replacement which wouldn't be covered by the insurance because it's a pre-existing condition and excluded on his policy (along with allergies, ear problems, skin problems, and arthritis). He only has the barest minimum of food for his size so we wouldn't be able to control his weight by reducing his food further.

I don't want my poor Ridley to lose his lovely tail or his nads!
Weight gain after castration can be kept under control by changing his food to lower calorie food and reducing portion sizes. We tend to recommend castration and spaying for all animals as it's generally a better option, health wise.
 
Weight gain after castration can be kept under control by changing his food to lower calorie food and reducing portion sizes. We tend to recommend castration and spaying for all animals as it's generally a better option, health wise.

We went through the castration conundrum with the vet nine years ago and the vet agreed that, although it's usually the best option, it wasn't the best option for Ridley. Basically the pros for him of not having it done outweighed the pros of having it done.
 
We went through the castration conundrum with the vet nine years ago and the vet agreed that, although it's usually the best option, it wasn't the best option for Ridley. Basically the pros for him of not having it done outweighed the pros of having it done.
Ah fair enough. Out of interest what were the pros for not having it done?
 
Ah fair enough. Out of interest what were the pros for not having it done?

Weight gain was one of them but the main one at the time was to do with hormones that he'd need after he had his femoral head excision but he wouldn't have them if he was neutered. Also something about a predisposition to a prostate problem that he was more likely to have because both of his "breeds" are high risk groups for it but neutering made it 70% more likely and the pro of that was although he definitely wouldn't get testicular cancer if he was done that cancer is infinitely easier to treat than the one that he was 70% more likely to get by being done. There were a couple of other things to do with cancer and hormones and his other conditions that I can't really remember now but we took the advice of the vet and then I researched further and we all agreed that to keep his nads gave him better overall health odds than removing them.
 
Despite some of the ANTI NAD RHETORIC in this thread, I have to say I've quite enjoyed mine. And that's without the ability of being able to freely lick them. I'm quite sure I'd rarely leave the house if I could. So I say well played, Floppet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom