Same, tbfKrishnan Guru-Murthy visibly gutted when announcing that Andrew had left the police station and won't be spending the night in the custody suite.
Are we REALLY supposed to believe the rest of them knew nothing about any of this??
![]()
I am entirely in for sticking at the royals, but let’s be fair about this- how much of YOUR sex life do you discuss with your family?
I am entirely in for sticking at the royals, but let’s be fair about this- how much of YOUR sex life do you discuss with your family?
6am uber going home
If Epstein visited Buckingham Palace then I believe they knew A LOT more than they let on. Considering The Queen also stumped up MILLIONS to pay off Virginia Giuffre as well I would say she knew a fair bit. If she knew, the rest did. They will do ANYTHING to protect the monarchy.
I know my Great-Uncle and wife often tried to initiate GROUP SEX with my parents, and they used to DRAG ME along to dinner at their house as a child so they wouldn’t GET WEIRD with them after too many TABOO and LEMONADES
6am uber going home
Paying them off, sure, dodgy as fuck, but that's not what you were implying earlier, or certainly not what I read.
Also, I really find this whole “you met Epstein, you must be a paedo/ paedo enabler” schtick absolute nonsense. I doubt he wandered into the palace with a parade of naked children on his arm.
Are we REALLY supposed to believe the rest of them knew nothing about any of this??
![]()
I don't think Charles was involved in paying off Andrew's accuser at all back then - so I don't know if he's complicit in this Andrew-Epstein saga? the Queen wouldn't have been taking Charles' guidance on a matter like that. she was complicit though.
the wider family knowing or having an idea of what he did is neither here nor there surely. what should they have done about it? run to Scotland Yard saying my brother was friends with Epstein? that information was public domain anyway.
If they hadn’t loaned him the money, presumably he would have declared himself bankrupt and Giuffre wouldn’t have gotten paid. I’m sure they could argue that loaning him the money was in the interests of the victims.Yes he was. Both him, The Queen and Prince Phillip loaned Andrew the money so if The Queen is complicit then Charles is too.
I think in the grand scheme of things for the British public it does definitely matter for the future of the monarchy if they knew about it, yes.
If they hadn’t loaned him the money, presumably he would have declared himself bankrupt and Giuffre wouldn’t have gotten paid. I’m sure they could argue that loaning him the money was in the interests of the victims.
we usually doSurely the British public will settle for nothing

It's only 11p when you take into account the savings you'll make on that Iceland pack of fruitMore importantly, how the FUCK is a newspaper £2 nowadays!?!?!?!?!?!??!
That's not an offer that'll have much uptake in Glasgow.It's only 11p when you take into account the savings you'll make on that Iceland pack of fruit
It's only 11p when you take into account the savings you'll make on that Iceland pack of fruit
What a lovely thought. Shame it won't happen.