I think they have already said they will cover up to the last Stock and Waterman single.I wonder what they are going to do when they get to 1991 and the break up of SAW. Will they even bother to cover Let’s Get To It?
Stock in particular seemed a little delusional. I did like Gavin coming in quickly suggesting that Kylie could have ended up like Jason if they hadn't moved her sound on, when he was bemoaning how they didn't sell as many singles or albums for Rhythm of Love.
The Rhythm of Love era may have been a commercial comedown from Enjoy Yourself, but by that point none of the other big names who were sticking loyally to the standard SAW sound were doing anywhere near as well, were they?
(I think the video is much more deserving of that than BTDYK)This makes Mike Stock's disparaging of the material even more absurd.Actually, I just checked that out. They never hit the top ten again as SAW past BTDYK other than with Kylie and (one song for) Jason.
According to Graham Stygle (he of Don't Forget Your Toothbrush superfan fame), What Do I Have To Do was recorded in the same session as BTDYK and Things Can Only Get Better and was one of the songs presented to Kylie and Terry Blamey as "see we have just as good material we've written for you" so it is odd that it wasn't mentioned at all.
Unless of course they plan on giving it its due in a standalone episode.(I think the video is much more deserving of that than BTDYK)


Has anyone listened yet? The sense of ownership that those at PWL had (and STILL have) over Kylie's career is staggering. David Howells seems the absolute worst.
Kylie's last single with PWL got to #20. Almost ALL (save for one) her deConstruction singles outperformed it . Her last studio album with them did not make the top 10. Both albums with the new label did. Yet he claims she was in the wilderness all those years. There's no acknowledgement that those years consolidated her success.
And the audacity of equating pre SexKylie to Spinning Around Kylie, as if they are anything like each other is absurd.
Ha yes! I enjoyed that as well. To be obsessed with sales when you’ve come up with those four singles (especially Better The Devil You Know and What Do I Have To Do) seems very silly but that was obviously their focusStock in particular seemed a little delusional. I did like Gavin coming in quickly suggesting that Kylie could have ended up like Jason if they hadn't moved her sound on, when he was bemoaning how they didn't sell as many singles or albums for Rhythm of Love.

But PWL Kylie was already on the wane. To suggest that her success significantly dropped off is garbage.I haven't listened yet, but there is some truth in that. The deConstruction years might have had higher chart positions but bar Confide In Me, they all missed the top ten and it was the start of the era of discounted first week singles, so they were nearly all fan base "hits" which crashed in week 2. (Having just checked, only Put Yourself In My Place climbed- and that only had a long chart run because it was around Christmas and fuck all else got released in those days). Impossible Princess absolutely bombed here as well. I concede KM94 did better off the back of those first two singles, but she was KINDA in the wilderness by the end of the IP campaign.
I don't know what the pre SexKylie= SpinningAroundKylie means without listening, but the press and attention around Spinning Around entirely focused on "KYLIE RETURNS TO POP!"- it was a huge part of the narrative. I remember being petrified Spinning Around would be a novelty hit and then that would basically be the end of her again. Thankfully she had On A Night Like This to back it up with.
I think this is partly it. Whilst David Howells is bitter that he no longer had a say in her visuals, Mike Stock and Matt Aitken resented having some of the control being taken away with the music - whilst she may not have been contributing to the song writing she was dictating direction by threatening to record elsewhere and having the final veto on mixes - very much at the same time that no one else was really doing the business for them.Mike Stock (and Matt Aitken) got it very right indeed for quite a long time so I can see why he might be bitter about suddenly not really knowing what he was doing, people losing interest and La Minogue calling the shots. It can’t be nice
I think Kakko probably killed it for Matt but I do hope they cover the reasons for him leavingI think this is partly it. Whilst David Howells is bitter that he no longer had a say in her visuals, Mike Stock and Matt Aitken resented having some of the control being taken away with the music - whilst she may not have been contributing to the song writing she was dictating direction by threatening to record elsewhere and having the final veto on mixes - very much at the same time that no one else was really doing the business for them.
It'll be interesting to hear what was really behind Matt Aitken's decision to dissolve their partnership.
Essentially, YES!Basically FUCK THE PATRIARCHY!