Dan Wootton accused of Sexual Harassment

Urgh I got 20 seconds into that clip and frankly that was 20 seconds of my life I'm not getting back.

The use of the word SMEAR CAMPAIGN, the "I owe it to you", the ACTING in his "sigh". He has such an inflated sense of his importance and his notability when really he's only managed to do what other washed up "journalists" do and become right wing social media trolls who's engagement comes purely from spewing hate and causing outrage.

I hope this finishes him off, but if he doesn't, I'm confident he'll go the way of Katie Hopkins in a year anyway and become a complete UNKNOWN. If he truly finds a circle of fans on Gbeebies let them have him.
 
Urgh I got 20 seconds into that clip and frankly that was 20 seconds of my life I'm not getting back.

The use of the word SMEAR CAMPAIGN, the "I owe it to you", the ACTING in his "sigh". He has such an inflated sense of his importance and his notability when really he's only managed to do what other washed up "journalists" do and become right wing social media trolls who's engagement comes purely from spewing hate and causing outrage.

I hope this finishes him off, but if he doesn't, I'm confident he'll go the way of Katie Hopkins in a year anyway and become a complete UNKNOWN. If he truly finds a circle of fans on Gbeebies let them have him.

What is it about that inflated self that so many poor, working class people lean to? One WHIFF of a god complex and they’re ALL EARS.

Whatever happened to the attraction of a man/woman of the people? Of supporting the underdog? Why put your interests in someone who wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire?

I know it draws back to “some people will believe any old shit” but it still doesn’t make sense
 
For what it's worth he seems like a grade A cunt and someone I WANT to be proven guilty (well, besides not wishing the reality on his victims), taken off the air, shown to the world as a prime example of what the "free speech loving alt-right figure Just Asking Questions" people are really like, tossed into prison and strung up by his toetails.

But the pessimist in me also expects nothing to stick and that he continues walking free, convincing your average Daily Twaddle reader that the truth is a construct created by leftist conspiracy or whatever.

If we're pretty certain, then great. Probably just not done enough research myself (better things to do). I'm just worried that if 'we' get too eager over someone that IF we have no firm, court-worthy evidence towards and he's tried and found Not Guilty then it discredits our side in the eyes of the average Joe as making shit up to take down political opponents yada yada
 
Last edited:
I know he’s accused of worse and obvious crimes (blackmail, assault), and that this isn’t okay, but is it a crime to pretend to be someone else and request pictures/videos from someone you know? I wonder if he’ll get away with pretending that’s all it is ever was, and that it’s not illegal.
 
For what it's worth he seems like a grade A cunt and someone I WANT to be proven guilty (well, besides not wishing the reality on his victims), taken off the air, shown to the world as a prime example of what the "free speech loving alt-right figure Just Asking Questions" people are really like, tossed into prison and strung up by his toetails.

But the pessimist in me also expects nothing to stick and that he continues walking free, convincing your average Daily Twaddle reader that the truth is a construct created by leftist conspiracy or whatever.

If we're pretty certain, then great. Probably just not done enough research myself (better things to do). I'm just worried that if 'we' get too eager over someone that IF we have no firm, court-worthy evidence towards and he's tried and found Not Guilty then it discredits our side in the eyes of the average Joe as making shit up to take down political opponents yada yada

Darling I love you but have some strength in your conviction. We get your point, you don’t have to keep explaining yourself.x
 
I know he’s accused of worse and obvious crimes (blackmail, assault), and that this isn’t okay, but is it a crime to pretend to be someone else and request pictures/videos from someone you know? I wonder if he’ll get away with pretending that’s all it is ever was, and that it’s not illegal.

I think at the moment it's more of a civil matter and a breach if privacy, I would argue that there is image based sexual abuse involved though as its a coercion to share private images that they wouldn't have done otherwise that can cause distress and embarrassment. Probably not in law yet though, but should be the way revenge porn has gone..
 
It’s just the absolute irony of Wootton being the poster boy for pitchfork-wielding, Guilty Until Proven Innocent “Believe All Victims” rubbish. Those who shout the loudest are frequently doing it to hide something.

No sympathy whatsoever.
 
Darling I love you but have some strength in your conviction. We get your point, you don’t have to keep explaining yourself.x
The point is that I don't know well enough and seem to be missing something. Maybe it's myself that I'm trying to explain to. I find it useful to bounce thoughts around and get input - and when it's somewhere like here that everyone's looking at you like you just denied the holocaust and suggested maybe Adolf was a great bunch of lads, it's a pretty good indication of taking a wrong turn and needing to do more digging and rethinking.

But, I get it 🤐
 
Nothing quite like the feeling of someone correcting your spelling of their name in an e-mail, then continuing to mis-spell it out of spite.
 
Oh, we've all got someone's name wrong on purpose just to be a twat.
I've had it at work where someone apologised in the email 'if they'd got it wrong', despite managing to find my email address which obviously includes my name.

I was simultaneously pissed off, in a state of admiration, and made a mental note to store it for future use.
 
In one of the cases, a very senior member of The Sun team took a kitchen knife to a meeting with a former editor of the newspaper with the intention of slitting their own wrists in front of the executive, who had sided with Wootton in a dispute ultimately settled for a six-figure sum.

:shock:
 
I mean if this is all true, I never get WHY someone like that would be protected. It’s not like he’s some kind of respected journalist. He kept getting promoted and was SHIT AT HIS JOB.
 
I saw some people suggesting he's got dirt on the Royals (particularly William's cheating) and so they're protecting him SOMEHOW
 
Oh the pegging?
IMG_7934.jpeg
 
In one of the cases, a very senior member of The Sun team took a kitchen knife to a meeting with a former editor of the newspaper with the intention of slitting their own wrists in front of the executive, who had sided with Wootton in a dispute ultimately settled for a six-figure sum.

:shock:
Why not just stab the executive instead? It might have taken everyone’s mind off the grisly Value biscuits and UHT
 
One of the challenges to this story is that the victims were also journalists at The Sun, so they probably deserve to be miserable.
 
I hope all this new stuff turns out to be true because it’ll make his ridiculous defence speech on GB News even FUNNIER
 
I hope all this new stuff turns out to be true because it’ll make his ridiculous defence speech on GB News even FUNNIER
“He had a knife,” acknowledged a visibly furious Dan. “But he also had a loaf and a pound of Red Leicester in his handbag.”
 
I heard he was quite spiteful about DIVA FEVER and sprinkled poison on their crayons and lip gloss :(
 
Goodness gracious. Blood seems a bit extreme but I’d not put anything past Dan and pals. Maybe it was one of his amazing SUPERSTAR PANEL :shock:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom