Joanne Rowling and other TERFs

Fe_2yjVVsAEvmHC

She saw so much #girlboss energy and couldn't not click that button.
 
Yeah, that'd be an odd turn. He's been quite vocal and supportive re: trans rights.
 
Wow she's going full at it Glinner style now huh? So much for "I don't even post on Twitter much I just happened to like a couple of tweets while doing research" or whatever her guff was before.


Voldemort speaks out in her defence
 
When these entitled SLEBS swan in to defend her they just make themselves look stupid.

NO, she’s not getting death threats just for saying she’s a “woman” :manson: That would be just as ridiculous as it sounds if she WAS. And RALPH is a dumbass if that’s what he truly believes.
 
Wow she's going full at it Glinner style now huh? So much for "I don't even post on Twitter much I just happened to like a couple of tweets while doing research" or whatever her guff was before.


Voldemort speaks out in her defence
What about the abuse that transgender people get directly from JK Rowling as well as her supporters? Why is he not defending them against that abuse? Or is it because they haven't written some books and paid him a paycheque as a result and therefore they are not worthy of his defence? Girl bye.

And no wonder his interview in the New York Times - as Madame X called it, one of the founders modern day patriarchy.
 
I read that more as deliberate shade in a “he’s be nothing without her” kinda way.
 
He doesn’t owe the COW anything! I’m quite sure he made himself rich and successful by GETTING and DOING a part for SEVERAL YEARS, who wrote the source material is a MOOT POINT.
 
It’s a weird CAPITALIST point, we should all be grateful for our jobs and never question our bosses actions? Imagine you criticised someone you worked for 15 years ago and they were all like YOU’D BE NOTHING WITHOUT ME.

You’d rightly consider them DERANGED!
 
I read that more as deliberate shade in a “he’s be nothing without her” kinda way.

Yeah I think it’s a sort of wilful misunderstanding in the tweet.

But the article is a load of old shit.

Does everyone who became successful thanks to Roald Dahl have to be antisemitic out of respect to the author?
 
Oh it’s absolute horseshit, of course, but then do we expect anything else from the deranged TERF brigade?
 
He didn't even mention her did he? Or mention 'cancellation'. He just expressed his support for transgender and non-binary children.

And she didn't cast him, either.
 
Also, he only commented because he was asked. He doesn't raise the subject - several interviewers stepped forward to confirm this; they didn't ask, so he didn't comment.
 
The main thing it speaks for is their attitude towards children. Children are never a person to them, they are an empty vessel, to be filled and moulded by them and them alone with only their views and opinions being allowed. Therefore, the adult Radcliffe is bad because the child Radcliffe was not educated solely by Rowling and had the temerity to grow into an adult with his own thoughts, experiences and opinions.
 
The fact that these transphobes/TERFs get so offended by the mere notion of someone expressing support for the transgender community that they have to write reams and reams of text about it says it all really. A sad reflection of society and the platform they are given by the patriarchy and the powers that be that they are allowed to spew this hatred in broadsheets, whilst anyone with an opposing view is automatically denigrated to being a loony leftie 'bully' on social media or Twitter. When we all know who the real bullies are.

It's got to change.
 
Hazell Dean has faced a twitter pile on after tweeting in support of Mermaids.
 
I do love how desperate Hazell is. She LOVES to tag a celebrity in and routinely gets NOTHING back :D

(Admittedly, not the point here, so kinda OT...sorry!)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom