Joanne Rowling and other TERFs

The way Twitter now puts the subscribers' replies first has absolutely destroyed the whole platform. The only people who would subscribe are absolute BRAIN DONORS, who the fuck wants to read what they have to say?
 
Yeah, I held on (whilst posting much less than before) to see how it panned out but it's completely fucked now. Musk is a full on eugenicist heading into his fash stage and he's turned Twitter into the Daily Mail's comments section. Gonna sort out my contacts and bail. Quite how I'm going to semi-stalk members of The Fall now, I have no idea...
 
  • Like
Reactions: COB
Apart from anything else, her smug and condescending sense of humour is fucking dreadful. She reminds me of Laurence Fox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COB
I need some clarity on the Tavistock stuff. Was it objectively doing bad work?
 
It was failing but only in the context that it wasn’t doing what it was designed to do - help trans kids. Mainly due to funding and waiting times, like any NHS institute.

The TERFS have spun it that it was closed down because they were experimenting on kids and transing them against their wishes :eyes:
 
jivafox said:
The TERFS have spun it that it was closed down because they were experimenting on kids and transing them against their wishes :eyes:
Click to expand...

At least we now have a nice British version of the lizard people and child-eating cult conspiracy
 
He's even retweeting a post requesting his tweet be reported for hate speech. Utterly appalling.
 
So, Stock thinks that you’re not a real woman unless you behave in exactly the way she wants you to. I’d say that the mask was slipping, but I don’t believe she ever bothered with a fucking mask.
 
CFF920BF-949A-4EEC-B4FB-B223A8A09FA0.jpeg
 
The fact they were all like “this ugly monster TERF is OBVIOUSLY JK Rowling!” is a bigger burn than anything we can come up with :D
 
jivafox said:
The fact they were all like “this ugly monster TERF is OBVIOUSLY JK Rowling!” is a bigger burn than anything we can come up with :D
Click to expand...
TBH I think it was quite likely supposed to be JK Rowling and so obvious that it was going to piss off the transphobes. I don’t see a huge amount of value in dunking on transphobes and riling them up as the primary means of allyship. Being pro-trans is more than being anti-transphobe. And the original video probably is saying a lot more along those lines, but no-one is talking about that because it seems they also used the vid to take a cheap shot at Rowling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom