Joanne Rowling and other TERFs

Cloud said:
Rowling is one of those who I wish never to have discovered on Twitter as I used to love all her positive wholesome anti-bullying messages in Harry Potter before she became yet another "famous person who thinks she's the authority on all political matters" (often contrary to her writing) :(
Click to expand...
I think she’s great sticks up for women not pretend women
 
G-U2MkUXcAA7kQ7.jpg


The defender of women has logged on!
 
for a writer she is absolutely dreadful at forming a coherent sentence (or thought)
 
I wonder if the heatwave killed off the mould and she had a moment of clarity or compassion.

More likely she’s just doing mental gymnastics to prove somebody wrong again and that she’s ALWAYS RIGHT.
 
This isn;t inconsistent for her; she was always of the view that you can wear what you want, call yourself whatever you want and have whatever surgeries you want but that none of this made someone AMAB a woman or someone AFAB a man. She's a gender essentialist and disbelieves in non-binary identities, as well as regularly erasing the experience of the millions born with intersex conditions.
 
The most horrible thing I find about her is how spiteful she is. I've never believed for a second that she's actually interested in making a point. It's purely personal and she's just petty and vindictive. Absolutely determined to make all transgender people as miserable as possible, even if it kills her.

Imagine becoming that rich only to waste it all on other people's business that doesn't concern you. Like, pick a better battle bitch.
 
anyone can say anything if it's their belief is horseshit. these people are fully crazy.
 
imagine actually sitting there and sifting through articles and clauses of European law to try and make the case that a mad racist and eugenics fanatic whose recent actions led in part to a man's suicide has the right to free speech. where DO they find these freaks?
 
Jark said:
anyone can say anything if it's their belief is horseshit. these people are fully crazy.
Click to expand...

see this is where i feel like they lose the majority of the general public - i don’t think people agree that you should just be able to say anything. imagine being any kind of minority and being expected to tolerate openly neo-nazi behaviour.
 
BBC are truly one own goal after another. still trying to appease the right despite the right having left government. dumb fuckwits.
 
The Strictly blurring incident is INSANE but on that documentary, the press release does refer to her as a "polarising figure" with a "contested legacy" so I'm not sure it'll be a puff piece.
 
GNL said:
The Strictly blurring incident is INSANE but on that documentary, the press release does refer to her as a "polarising figure" with a "contested legacy" so I'm not sure it'll be a puff piece.
Click to expand...
True, but they’re making cuts across the board and this is what they choose to spend money on?!
 
Art Decade said:
Click to expand...


I'm not sure I agree with that...it depends on what the subject of the documentary is. A hagiography is one thing, but the blurb doesn’t make it seem exactly that.

What we get, however, is a whole other point.
GNL said:
The Strictly blurring incident is INSANE but on that documentary, the press release does refer to her as a "polarising figure" with a "contested legacy" so I'm not sure it'll be a puff piece.
Click to expand...
I wrote that piece above before GNL’s comment but it didn’t post …
 
I mean there are really only 2 ways it can go - it's either sanctioned and woo JK - which seems unlikely - or it's critical and going to get legalled to hell and back. Either way I doubt it's going to exactly be must watch TV - really someone with the cash to back this and no fucks to give should be making it - like a US Streamer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top Bottom