The USA: The Trump Years 2.0 (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Thread starter AGinAg (37)
  • Start date Start date
Did he really just suggest that the US could invade Spain's military bases, and why have we now reached a point that I don't find that shocking at all?
 
The mad bastard is now losing his way mid-sentence and just inventing words. I wish he'd decline faster; I reiterate the position that I want his death to be public and humiliating. Preferably before he starts ordering the invasion of air bases rather than just casually suggesting it.
 
octophone said:
The mad bastard is now losing his way mid-sentence and just inventing words. I wish he'd decline faster; I reiterate the position that I want his death to be public and humiliating. Preferably before he starts ordering the invasion of air bases rather than just casually suggesting it.
Click to expand...
He's been glitching while speaking for a while now. In another timeline he's an angry punk poet.
 
I’m surprised he was gracious about it considering she was clearly even worse that most of the rest of his cabinet and her position was not at all tenable. Her recent hearing (and I’ve only seen highlights) was particularly shocking.

Not sure where the clip is now but it rings particularly true today - one woman said “we’ll still be here long after Trump has gone and we won’t forget. We will make you accountable”. She sat stone faced. I wonder if she’s thinking about that today…
 
Bizarre. He’s giving up a senate seat for life for two years as the man responsible for ICE.
 
I’m sure there will be more incentives than that. Everyone in the current cabinet seems to be knee deep in kickbacks
 
The Kristi Noem stuff is really juicy and it’s worth following the breadcrumbs on this. Too many links to share but essentially it WAS her kickback that got her fired (ALLEGEDLY!)

She lied under oath about the $143m contract and implicated Trump in it. That was 2 days ago. Ding ding!

The best part is that in her departure speech she ACTUALLY quoted George Orwell not even slightly realising the irony in his intent (mocking fascism) and her own irony in quoting it :D

She is new levels of fucking stupid. And she was in charge of Homeland Security for over a year!
 
IMG_3147.jpeg
 
Pete Hesgeth has been doing press conferences giddy as a pubescent teenager seeing his first porn mag.

Beaming from ear to ear as he talks about dropping bombs in cities, full of pride at all the attention he’s getting. He’s been waiting for this very moment.

I’m honestly nauseous.
 
He likes to call himself the Commmander In Chief... until they accidentally bomb a school, and then he doesn't know much about it.
 
When are these fucking midterm elections? Considering the amount of wreckage this buffoon is able to cause in such a short amount of time I fear they're just not coming soon enough.:Diane:
 
The dead schoogirls have certainly stopped people talking about the Epstein files, so he must be so happy!
 
MAGA: "Well, if he wanted to fuck kids. he wouldn't keep killing them, right?"
 
Not me actively searching for proof that this isn’t real. But it is.



More and more convinced that the war is just to distract from people seeing all this shit. In any other era this would be big news.
 
Here’s another one. This actual child with no qualifications (other than being male and white) was hired by Musk to cut millions in funding by looking for certain words in the titles of grants, like “lgbtq” or “Native American” or “women”.

 
Sorry to keep sharing this rage bait but if I’m reading it someone else has to too. The activities of this government needs to be widely documented because in 50 years (if we’re still here) nobody would believe it happened.



On March 10, 2026, the United States cast the sole “no” vote against the UN Commission on the Status of Women’s final document.

The result was historic: 37 countries voted in favor, 1 voted no, and 6 abstained — breaking with roughly 70 years of consensus around the annual agreed conclusions on women’s rights.
Click to expand...
The U.S. said it opposed language it viewed as promoting:

• “gender ideology”

• vague commitments on sexual and reproductive health that could be read as implying abortion rights

• references tied to AI regulation and climate-related framing
Click to expand...
Before the final vote, the U.S. also proposed eight amendments aimed at removing references to terms such as “intersectionality” and “sexual and reproductive health and rights.”

Those amendments failed.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom