Tisch
DO IT FOR HER
Started going on about the MONARCHY at one pointBaker is ACTIVELY INCOHERENT. It could not be more delicious.
Started going on about the MONARCHY at one pointBaker is ACTIVELY INCOHERENT. It could not be more delicious.
Maybe he’ll stand in the Richmond by-election.They keep asking Steve Baker if he's going to run for leader of the Conservatives - can he do that if he loses his seat?
So is my birth place.My grandparents seat in Barnsley is a likely Reform gain![]()
That's a bit scary. There are going to be a few things for Labour to think about after tonight.Reform UK predicted to grab a few seats from Labour: Barnsley North and South, Hartlepool.
She'll get very animated at about 1.30am. She'll also start sniffing a lot.What’s the betting she storms off the set before midnight?
I'm not impressed with the BBC graphics and presentation so far girls. It's not very SEXY is it. It's giving Fox News
Absolutely love Krishnan. I imagine he’s really hairy and has great tits. He’s very funny when mansplaining, would offer you a bump when the kids are in bed, obviously prefers LOL gay/femme activities like failing at Bake Off AND helps refugees out of the sea mid-news report![]()
Maths, dear Funky, Maths.Someone explain this to me. The clever poll man at the BBC is saying that to look deeper at the results, the landslide isn't necessarily because Labour have taken the Tory vote, but because Reform has, and Labour have benefited from it.
Which does make sense in isolation, but Labour were polling HIGHER 2 months ago pre-Farage when Reform were barely scratching the surface. So how can that be true?
Surely they're downplaying Labour's impact here. They haven't ACCIDENTALLY taken power.
Maths, dear Funky, Maths.
Essentially, if Labour were going to get 35% of the vote in a safe Tory constituency and the Tories were going to get 45%, but Reform leached away half of that, the Tories would get 22.5%, Reform would get 22.5% and Labour would win the seat whilst getting the same number of votes that they would have pre-Reform.Someone explain this to me. The clever poll man at the BBC is saying that to look deeper at the results, the landslide isn't necessarily because Labour have taken the Tory vote, but because Reform has, and Labour have benefited from it.
Which does make sense in isolation, but Labour were polling HIGHER 2 months ago pre-Farage when Reform were barely scratching the surface. So how can that be true?
Surely they're downplaying Labour's impact here. They haven't ACCIDENTALLY taken power.
Or have they convinced the public to vote for them precisely because they have shifted right?I think Reform getting some traction is going to make the tories think they’ve gone “soft”, but actually that makes absolutely no sense because ultimately Labour’s landslide to me suggests the country wants to move further towards the left?
I mean, I didn't mean to be patronising, it literally is just maths. The more the vote is split the lower the percentage you need to win a seat. As mentioned, Labour are on course to split the difference between the 2017 and 2019 vote shares, but the geography of those votes and the Tories losing a chunk of their vote share means FPTP gives you insane majoritiesDon't be so fucking patronising. That doesn't answer the clear point I made.
Perhaps…Or have they convinced the public to vote for them precisely because they have shifted right?
My mask has slipped!Kuenssberg HATES the Lib Dems. @ZenGiraffe ‘s hidden secret identity revealed.