Admin Requests (2 Viewers)

[ExcitableWoof]

and what?? are we that tied to tradition?

it's really not a bad idea at all to keep it relatively frequent. a lot can happen in the space of 2-3 years. a very active poster can become someone who logs in once a month and barely contributes. in fact that does happen with mods. better to keep it regular.

again - even if the mod personnel doesn't change, or nobody volunteers, just giving users the opportunity once a year and having an election if required feels like a good way of keeping everything fresh and making sure the current team comprises active posters. I feel like you're reacting as though something seismic is being suggested rather than a simple annual check-in.

General Election Now! Your not my PM! Down with Andy Burnham.

 

[K.C.]

A higher turnover may reduce mod efficacy though because new people have to be trained and find their footing - especially in the treacherous waters of Mooyp. A biennial election might be better than annual.

 

[lolly]

Training? You can pick it up in no time.

 

[lolly]

And in terms of reducing efficiency, I'd personally be in favour of expanding the team of mods over replacing any, anyway.

 

[Shoat]

I vote Big Ron, Enya Dearest and Inner Smile (Weekend Edition)

 

[Rita]

If people are absent do they really want to continue? I looked at the mod list and all were last on today or yesterday so I don’t really know who has gone AWOL?

 

[Penelope]

I don't see an urgent need for annual elections, but once every two years (with the occasional MOD BY-ELECTION if someone fancies buggering off ) seems like a decent way to return to some semblance of regularity.

 

[Agneeta]

So @Administrator is this going ahead?

I'm not sure testing the water by leaving it here, is the right way forward. Having an active topic actually announcing the election, is more likely to encourage posters to get involved.

 

[Indie]

So @Administrator is this going ahead?

I'm not sure testing the water by leaving it here, is the right way forward. Having an active topic actually announcing the election, is more likely to encourage posters to get involved.

Probably yes. I don't see why not.

Although admin shouldn't canvass their own election. There is bias. One of the current @Moderator team should do it. That's the usual way.

 

[Agneeta]

Probably yes. I don't see why not.

Although admin shouldn't canvass their own election. There is bias. One of the current @Moderator team should do it. That's the usual way.

A mod election first though, run by admin no? Or the other way round.

 

[Indie]

A mod election first though, run by admin no? Or the other way round.

Admin first. That way any failed admin candidates can apply for mod.