funky
(OMF)
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
- Messages
- 103,963
Not @ZenGiraffe referencing THE BEATLES! 


I was watching a YouTube video of the top song every month throughout the 90s - it’s INSANE how much things advanced in a ten year stretch, while still finding time for specific and iconic eras throughout the decade. When I watch something from 2014 it just doesn’t feel like it was ten years ago - even 2004 doesn’t seem that dim and distant except everyone has mega straight hair and white cargo pants.But did they?
It still feels the same as 2007 or 2008 were. But 1990 feels like a complete new beginning from the 80s.
Musically, the 90's started in about 1992. Maybe 1991.
1990 was still as 80s as fuck.
Hideous.The 90s aesthetic was pink, yellow and blue with shadows, triangles and squiggly lines.
I saw this Foreigner album cover the other day - could it be any more 80s?
![]()
Also on the alternative and rock side, you had Stone Roses and Nirvana emerging in 1989 and Pearl Jam forming in 1990, which basically formed the 90s sound in the UK and US. Throw in Primal Scream, RHCP and a few others, who emerged in late 80s but broke out early 90s, and I think there is a stark difference between the hair metal and soft rock of the 80s and the alternative, grunge and britpop of the 90s.
Well to a point earlier made, whether you look at first albums or breakout albums, The Beatles didn't start until 1962 but they still basically owned the 60s. I'd say 1991 still is a good starting point for a "90s sound".
This nails it. "Eras" are now so much shorter because of technology - "Brat Summer" was declared over by Pitchfork last week less than 2 months after the album was released. Trends last a few weeks before becoming old and tired. If we call Britpop from Suede arriving to Oasis playing Knebworth, it was 4 years. Have we had any musical trend or movement lasting a good 4 years since then? Emo, maybe? Even then, it seemed to rise up, peak and drop down to an underground within 2 years. Information flows in such a way now that a 'slow' rise is 3 months rather than 3 years.
Of course decades don't fit exactly into tidy narratives. Years are of course entirely arbitrary
1979 managed to look like 1975 and 1982 all at once. A musical decade begins at whatever point your genre of choice begins. It's easy to pop 80s Ride on Time or early grunge/ Madchester into the 90s. 80s power ballads/ hair rock were still in full force in the early 90s.
I always think 1995-2005 looks like a tidier decades. Even more interesting is dividing time into chunks of 3 years, for a better breakdown of trends.
I don't know I Want You, but I LOVE Octopus's Garden.I think we can all be objective enough to recognise that no decade shifted culturally as fast as the 60s though. I mean in 1960 they were listening to Elvis Presley and Perry Como and Frank Sinatra. In 1970 they were listening to The Doors, Jimi Hendrix and James Brown.
And the Beatles went from "She Loves You" to "I Want You" in SIX YEARS.
I don't know I Want You, but I LOVE Octopus's Garden.
and YET, from the same album...And the 90s treated us to Eldorado, which was amazing TV for initially all the wrong reasons. And then was cruelly taken from us just as it started to make it work.
LOVE IT
Howards' Way ran from 1985 to 1990.That made me think of Howard’s Way, which I feel was massive for about 5 minutes and then it disappeared never to be heard from again.
...and THAT'S nostalgia.So far this topic has taught me that the 90s was great, if you ignore all the shit and focus on tiny bits of rubbish.