Karl Lagerfeld DEAD
- Thread starter jivafox
- Start date
Mats
User
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 26,425
oh. I guess I liked his schtick (white hair, black glasses) but as a person seemed pretty vile. one of my friends, who is a model, got hit on by Karly but he rejected his advances, THANK GOD
I never knew he had a cute boyfriend back in the day (who died in '89). Lagerfeld on the other hand looks like Ozzy dressed as Beethoven here
I never knew he had a cute boyfriend back in the day (who died in '89). Lagerfeld on the other hand looks like Ozzy dressed as Beethoven here
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
As I said I couldnt care less what he was like as a person. I admired his fashion output greatly.
Pipo
LOVE SENSATION y'knowhattamean
Mariah could be a CUNT and you'd still buy her albums RIGHT?
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
Hardly the SAME. Karl Lagerfeld was a visionary, but for decades he was one of the people who made the fashion industry so problematic. For years he would stubbornly use only the skinniest of models because the clothes would "drape" better, despite efforts to curb the industry from supporting underage and underweight girls. His beauty-elite rhetoric was awful. There's a difference between being a cunt and being a problem.
Pipo
LOVE SENSATION y'knowhattamean
whilst I agree and I'm not defending him cause I also did come accross some terrible (but funny) statements he would make about short people, women, sweatpants, countries, etc; but some friends and people I know couldn't care less if he was problematic, they would just see his t-shirts with nice graphics on nice racks inside NICE shops and would shell out a stupid amount of money for them and that's what I meant with the Mariah example.
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
That's called turning the blind eye? It's the same thing with R Kelly and his music. Can we and SHOULD we separate the art from the artist?
Mariah isn't problematic. She's just ridiculous. And at the end of the day she's more or less harmless. Karl Lagerfeld was in a position to really influence and change how the industry treated weight and age, and he chose to keep it elitist and harmful. And I firmly that he retained those views.
Mariah isn't problematic. She's just ridiculous. And at the end of the day she's more or less harmless. Karl Lagerfeld was in a position to really influence and change how the industry treated weight and age, and he chose to keep it elitist and harmful. And I firmly that he retained those views.
big ron
King of moopy
- Pronouns
- He/him
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2004
- Messages
- 39,265
I know you've got me on block KC but HA!
A
AGinAg (37)
Guest
Why was he such a cunt?
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
I also never liked the way he'd churn out the same collection season after season (even though they were all gorgeous and harnessed the most loyal client-base in history), but spend millions putting a up a flashy set to make it look like it was 'unique'.
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
@KindaCool are you comparing R Kelly to Karl Lagerfeld? 
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
@KindaCool are you comparing R Kelly to Karl Lagerfeld?
Yes. Karl also enlisted all his models into a sex cult and then also brainwashed them into having sex in Chanel Couture. In what part of my post was this not made explicit?
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
Excuse me, do not get your back up with me. I was simply asking you a question. I had no idea about that part of his life, nor have I ever seen anything insinuating anything of the sort.
A
AGinAg (37)
Guest
I seriously need some receipts for his cuntery. I'm not seeing anything life changing so far.
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
I would also like to add he did nothing of the sort in “churning out the same collection season after season”. His runway shows were always showstopping. He brought Chanel back from the dead in the 80’s, and raised Fendi’s profile nought to a million.
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
There IS no similarity between the two people. It's the SITUATION they're in that's the same. Both people face having their artistic legacy tarnished because of their personal lives/habits. My back isn't "up", it was just a strange question.
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
Yes, that's what I mean though. His SHOWS were a spectacle. But the clothes themselves were always the same. I understand that it's to create hype and draw in crowds. But it always seemed a but pretentious to me. Just my personal opinion.
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
I don’t see how Lagerfeld is going to get his legacy tarnished at all? Yes, he may not have been to your taste, but unless people are now going to come out of the woodwork with horror stories now he is dead I think everything is already OUT THERE. People have already formed their opinions darling,like you clearly have.
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
Yes obviously his situation is nowhere near as dire, or even as controversial, as R Kelly, but those who follow the industry are happy not to support his work. Whereas R Kelly's situation is much more well-known
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
Those who follow the industry are happy not to follow Lagerfelds work? Darling, what the HELL are you talking about?
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
Yes! Online platforms, like forums or social media (kinda like us who follow music or lifestyle or whatever), who are also consumers of fashion/cosmetics/accessories/etc do not buy from Chanel because they're aware of what he's stood for. Not a very complex concept.
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
The boycotting seems to have worked well since Chanel had a turnover of over 10 billion in 2017. Are you sure they aren’t boycotting Beckham?
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
Who said anything about a boycott? It's just a personal choice. A personal stand. It's not about what the person stands for. The goal isn't always to bring a business down.
A boycott would be more like PETA, where it's a collective of people actively seeking to curb a business.
A boycott would be more like PETA, where it's a collective of people actively seeking to curb a business.
Peekaboo
User
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2005
- Messages
- 6,363
I don't follow fashion much but he *did* have a reputation for at least being rude, off the top of my head I remember he called Adele fat and said Pippa Middleton should never show her face, just her arse (I mean 
). He just sounded like your average old bitter fashionista queen who treated women like clothes hangers, I'm sure he's hardly the only one in that world.
). He just sounded like your average old bitter fashionista queen who treated women like clothes hangers, I'm sure he's hardly the only one in that world.
Rita
User
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 49,674
A boycott means to withdraw either SOCIAL or commercial relations. You said these people do not buy from Chanel as they are aware of what he stood for. They are not withdrawing to drum up business for him, now are they? Now, ENOUGH. We know you don’t like him, and we get the message.
K.C.
Users
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,347
No. You're wrong. A boycott is an ORGANIZED ACTION to get OTHERS to do the same. If I decided to stop buying from Amazon tomorrow because of whatever reason I found unethical, that doesn't mean I'm boycotting it. If I went around trying to get OTHERS to stop buying from it THEN is I'd boycotting.