Moopy Upgrade 2021 - THE REACTION

[jivafox]

My suggestion:

Chuck in there and I'm with you

 

[AGinAg (37)]

Dealing out negative emojis is surely going to make people feel rotten at worst. I am against this. Surely under the new bullying rules this is shaky ground.

 

[Iguana]

Do we really have a ?

 

[Kate]

Yes I am strongly against the

 

[ZenGiraffe]

Dealing out negative emojis is surely going to make people feel rotten at worst. I am against this. Surely under the new bullying rules this is shaky ground.

People can and do react with then already, as an individual post. Moving them to reactions would just be a fun way of making it more personalised to the forum, in my view.

And it is a toy that can and will be taken away if it causes problems.

 

[Kate]

?????

 

[Kate]

If we're going to let people each other we may as well BRING BACK TAGS.

(BRING BACK TAGS)

 

[ZenGiraffe]

(BRING BACK TAGS)

Though it is a fair point

 

[AGinAg (37)]

People can and do react with then already, as an individual post. Moving them to reactions would just be a fun way of making it more personalised to the forum, in my view.

And it is a toy that can and will be taken away if it causes problems.

I just see in an era where we've removed tags and said no to tags, we're adding a tool with built in unpleasantness.

 

[AGinAg (37)]

Positive emojis are of course fine.

 

[OutSynk]

I only ever remember tags used to exist when someone mentions them.

 

[D5K]

It's one thing deciding to reply and post a yourself, it's quite another to see it as a pre-authorised and encouraged response by the community.

 

[Lucille]

There’s a difference between expressing a NEGATIVE reaction and BULLYING, I’d like to think we’re not so reactionary we can’t tell the difference.

 

[dmlaw]

I don't think we need reaction emojis that could be used or taken as an insult, particularly or .

Right on board with amongst others. I'd say anything which couldn't plausibly add a +1 to the reaction score should be avoided.

 

[AGinAg (37)]

There’s a difference between expressing a NEGATIVE reaction and BULLYING, I’d like to think we’re not so reactionary we can’t tell the difference.

In the rough and rumble of a Eurovision or ASFM thread, maybe. But that's not always the case at every moment.

I think I'd feel awful if I was getting a barrage of negative emoji responses.

 

[D5K]

I don't think we need reaction emojis that could be used or taken as an insult, particularly or .

Right on board with amongst others. I'd say anything which couldn't plausibly add a +1 to the reaction score should be avoided.

I get most of them but can't quite see how often people would need to quickly respond to a post with a , but maybe I've never quite understood what it means

 

[Lucille]

 

[AGinAg (37)]

It's also going to slightly reduce posting levels, but I feel we've gone beyond that now.

 

[Iguana]

I really don't feel strongly, but are you suggesting we remove altogether?! What's the difference between responding to a post with it and reacting to a post with it?

 

[D5K]

I really don't feel strongly, but are you suggesting we remove altogether?! What's the difference between responding to a post with it and reacting to a post with it?

Ease of access.

 

[GNL]

I think ANGERY REACTS and SAD REACTS are fine, but eye rolls and manson should be swerved.

 

[Iguana]

Ease of access.

 

[Iguana]

I accessed it quite easily

 

[Iguana]

I'm only playing devil's advocate. I agree it shouldn't be a reaction

 

[dmlaw]

I get most of them but can't quite see how often people would need to quickly respond to a post with a , but maybe I've never quite understood what it means

The shortcut for it is : horny : without the spaces. It's a reaction to a flirtacious post, or at least that's how I use it.

 

[OutSynk]

I get most of them but can't quite see how often people would need to quickly respond to a post with a , but maybe I've never quite understood what it means

Depends if @vespertine keeps delivering the goods.

 

[AGinAg (37)]

Ease of access.

Simple as that really.

 

[Iguana]

I don't agree it's the same thing as tags though

 

[D5K]

The shortcut for it is : horny : without the spaces. It's a reaction to a flirtacious post, or at least that's how I use it.

Ah that explains why I never come across it

 

[Lucille]

Yes keep out of it, when I’m HURTING and BULLYING people with an EMOJI, I want it to be EXPLICIT.

 

[AGinAg (37)]

I don't agree it's the same thing as tags though

It's not in many ways, but they're both tools which can be used to make people feel shit.

 

[dmlaw]

I really don't feel strongly, but are you suggesting we remove altogether?! What's the difference between responding to a post with it and reacting to a post with it?

I've only used to react to a poster a couple of times ever. It's essentially as strong a one emoji insult as we have and I don't think we want to have it as one of six or so emojis which we are actively encouraging to used to each other. We should be trying to be nicer than that these days.

 

[Iguana]

Let's not forget is literally Moopy's logo!

 

[OutSynk]

Ease of access.

 

[AGinAg (37)]

I've only used to react to a poster a couple of times ever. It's essentially as strong a one emoji insult as we have and I don't think we want to have it as one of six or so emojis which we are actively encouraging to used to each other. We should be trying to be nicer than that these days.

This is the integral difference.

 

[Iguana]

I've only used to react to a poster a couple of times ever. It's essentially as strong a one emoji insult as we have and I don't think we want to have it as one of six or so emojis which we are actively encouraging to used to each other. We should be trying to be nicer than that these days.

Yeah I agree with that.

 

[ZenGiraffe]

Let's not forget is literally Moopy's logo!

Yeah this was my thinking for suggesting it's inclusion. However I take everyone else's point of view and agree that it's best not included.

I'm not as convinced about though, it's ludicrously common

 

[AGinAg (37)]

Yeah this was my thinking for suggesting it's inclusion. However I take everyone else's point of view and agree that it's best not included.

I'm not as convinced about though, it's ludicrously common

is borderline these days. It's a bit more OH REALLY? rather than whatever connotations the manson has these days. Manson really is the Moopy version of calling someone a CUNT and meaning it.

 

[OutSynk]

I'm not as convinced about though, it's ludicrously common

If SDF ever returns he’s gonna abuse it so much.

 

[Lucille]

is borderline these days. It's a bit more OH REALLY? rather than whatever connotations the manson has these days. Manson really is the Moopy version of calling someone a CUNT and meaning it.

I can’t this enough.