The United Kingdom: The RISHI RICH Sunak ERA

Tories: The barge is perfectly adequate for migrants.

Everyone else: The barge has Legionnaire's disease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zu
They are so INCOMPETENT! Are they not embarrassed? Even the most rabid DM crowd is turning on them as they at least expect them to do EVIL correctly.
 
WHY?

Clampdown on gender-neutral toilets planned by the government

 
  • Angry
Reactions: LTZ
I’ve never worked in an office with gendered toilets! This is just so silly, is ANYONE crying out for this?
 
It's obviously pandering, but for something no one asked for. I guess they're just trying to make life harder for trans people and winding up the wokerati. It's just so fucking desperate and pointless.
 
To be fair, I don’t fucking want gender neutral toilets AT ALL.

I mean, it’ll RUIN cottaging.
 
I understand the desire for gendered toilets where it's a cubicles and urinals set up.

Most places I've been with gender-neutral toilets like that also have men's and women's toilets elsewhere anyway though, so it feels like a non issue.
 
The culture wars are true bottom of the barrel shit. The only surprising thing is that Labour is engaging with them instead of using this to say fuck this distraction, we're serious about fixing the country. No doubt by tomorrow Rachel Reeves will have affirmed her support for the government's brave crusade against... bathrooms.
 
20230814_233515.jpg
 
Rishi Sunak posting a picture that hasn't been shot to make him look tall. That's growth! (Not literally, but...)
 
Good for her (if that is aimed at her colleagues which I suspect it is) :D



It was after this interview where she got a bit of a grilling from ITV and declared "I'M NOT LOOKING TO BE CONGRATULATED!" :ToneNervous:
 
Maybe start doing a GOOD JOB if you’d like to be thanked for one you hard faced cow! :D
 
Stop being so unfair on the government. Schools can suddenly collapse for many reasons, not just RAAC.

 
What is so stupid about this is that the immediate responsibility probably does sit elsewhere but if you were the Department for Education and you had sent out a warning 5 years ago, wouldn’t you instinctively (direct responsibility or not) check in on what had been done and if nothing had been done, taken it out of local authority hands? The government can’t just shrug its shoulders and say ‘well we sent a letter!’
 
What is so stupid about this is that the immediate responsibility probably does sit elsewhere but if you were the Department for Education and you had sent out a warning 5 years ago, wouldn’t you instinctively (direct responsibility or not) check in on what had been done and if nothing had been done, taken it out of local authority hands?

Maybe if Gillian Keegan wasn't the seventh education secretary in five years, there might've been a chance of someone remembering a letter had been sent in the first place :D

There's surely loads of stuff like this that has slipped between the cracks because pretty much every position has changed hands so many times recently.
 
Interestingly (maybe), according to the News Agents, is that apparently she came in as the SoS and asked why nothing had been done, so made the decision to close schools. No. 10 is fuming about this and thinks she went too far, too quickly. I don’t have any sympathy for her, it’s her job, but if true it is a damning indictment of how crap Sunak’s administration is.

And she certainly shouldn’t be asking for thanks :D
 
She’s been SoS since last October though. If she had made this decision in early summer, she might have got the praise she wanted. Leaving it a few days before the start of term is ridiculous.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom